· 12/27/1994
American Home Products Corp. v. Procter & Gamble Co.
Citations
- 871 F. Supp. 739
- 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18813
- 1994 WL 727961
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a plaintiff must prove that the claim in question is false or misleading, not merely unsubstantiated
- applying the Lanham Act to print advertisements in medical journals, TV commercials and print newspapers
- refusing to extend a survey on a television ad and an insert to other print ads, even though they contained elements in common with the messages tested
- applying the Lanham Act to print advertisements in medical journals, TV commercials and print newspapers
- refusing to extend a survey on a television ad and an insert to other print ads, even though they contained elements in common with the messages tested
- respondents given extended time to answer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Politan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.