Skip to main content
· 12/27/1994

American Home Products Corp. v. Procter & Gamble Co.

Citations

  • 871 F. Supp. 739
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18813
  • 1994 WL 727961

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a plaintiff must prove that the claim in question is false or misleading, not merely unsubstantiated
  • applying the Lanham Act to print advertisements in medical journals, TV commercials and print newspapers
  • refusing to extend a survey on a television ad and an insert to other print ads, even though they contained elements in common with the messages tested
  • applying the Lanham Act to print advertisements in medical journals, TV commercials and print newspapers
  • refusing to extend a survey on a television ad and an insert to other print ads, even though they contained elements in common with the messages tested
  • respondents given extended time to answer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Politan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.