Skip to main content
· 7/28/1998

American Home Assurance Company, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Unitramp Limited and Unitramp, S.A., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellants

Citations

  • 146 F.3d 311
  • 1998 A.M.C. 2609
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 17890
  • 1998 WL 387519

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining the manifestation trigger of coverage theory as being “when the damage is capable of being easily perceived, recognized and understood”
  • defining the manifestation trigger of coverage theory as being A when the damage is capable of being easily perceived, recognized and understood @
  • defining the manifestation trigger of coverage theory as being “when the damage is capable of being easily perceived, recognized and understood”
  • damage was not manifest when watered down fuel was loaded but became so only after testing revealed defect
  • “ ‘Apparent,’ like ‘manifest,’ means ‘capable of easy perception.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Smith, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.