Skip to main content
· 1/8/2004

American Home Assurance Co. v. Unauthorized Practice of Law Committee

Citations

  • 121 S.W.3d 831
  • 2003 WL 22532817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that corporate practice of law imputed from acts of lawyer agent would not constitute unauthorized practice of law if corporation retained direct interest in matter
  • suggesting that corporate practice of law imputed from acts of lawyer agent would not constitute unauthorized practice of law if corporation retained direct interest in matter
  • suggesting that corporate practice of law imputed from acts of lawyer agent would not constitute unauthorized practice of law if corporation retained direct interest in matter
  • suggesting that corporate practice of law imputed from acts of lawyer agent would not constitute unauthorized practice of law if corporation retained direct interest in matter
  • \The UPLC also concedes that `there is no evidence in the record regarding complaints by insureds' despite the long period during which insurance companies have used staff counsel.\
  • “The UPLC also concedes that ‘there is no evidence in the record regarding complaints by insureds’ despite the long period during which insurance companies have used staff counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnot, Wright, McCall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.