American Home Assurance Co. v. Osbourn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the statute of limitations for the malpractice claim against the insurance broker began to run on the date when the insurance company sent a letter \stating there was no coverage and declining to provide a defense\
• holding that the statute of limitations for the malpractice claim against the insurance broker began to run on the date when the insurance company sent a letter “stating there was no coverage and declining to provide a defense”
• holding that the statute of limitations for the malpractice claim against the insurance broker began to run on the date when the insurance company sent a letter “stating there was no coverage and declining to provide a defense”
• explaining that the cause of action cannot accrue until there is some “legal harm”
• explaining that the cause of action cannot accrue until there is some \legal harm\
• explaining that the cause of action cannot accrue until there is some “legal harm”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).