American Home Assurance Co. v. Golomb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• asserting that not every violation of rules of professional responsibility “justifies the voiding of a contract”
• a contingency-fee agreement was valid for the type of case but contained an illegal contingent-fee percentage because the attorney engaged in intentional and deceptive behavior
• when a contract is void, the courts will assist neither party but will leave them where they have placed themselves
• when a contract is void, the courts will assist neither party but will leave them where they have placed themselves

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).