American Hearing Aid Associates, Inc. v. GN Resound North America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the choice of law clause referring to \this agreement\ limits application of the provision to contract claims, rather than tort claims
• holding that materials readily available on the plaintiff's website were available to the public and did not qualify as trade secrets
• noting that “[] courts have denied protection to customer lists which are easily generated from trade journals, ordinary telephone listings, or an employee's general knowledge of who, in an established industry, is a potential customer for a given product”
• applying Pennsylvania law to conversion claim where there was no apparent conflict with Pennsylvania law and the law of California

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).