Skip to main content
· 8/12/2015

American Freedom Defense Initiative v. King County

Citations

  • 796 F.3d 1165
  • 43 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 3095
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14098
  • 2015 WL 4755463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[M]etro’s rejection of the ad on the ground of falsity likely was reasonable and viewpoint neutral.”
  • “In that regard, we note that a hypothetical rejection of an ad for a trivial inaccuracy might give rise to an inference that the rejection was, in fact, unreasonable or viewpoint-based.”
  • mandatory injunctions are disfavored and will not be entered in doubtful cases
  • mandatory injunctions are disfavored and will not be entered in doubtful cases
  • mandatory injunctions are disfavored and will not be entered in doubtful cases
  • decision below, relying on SeaMAC

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hawkins, Graber, Gould

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.