American Forest Resource Council v. Shea

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a “successor-in-interest to a prior party” will “be considered in privity with a party to the prior action”
• noting that a “successor-in-interest to a prior party” will “be considered in privity with a party to the prior action”
• “The very language of § 2202 of the Declaratory Judgment Act indicates that the prevailing party in a declaratory judgment may seek further relief in the form of damages or an injunction.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).