American Fidelity and Casualty Company, Inc. v. The Greyhound Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in a declaratory judgment action, it was proper to allow a third-party tort claim under Rule 14
• “It is settled that impleader under Rule 14(a) does not require an identity of claims, or even that the claims rest on the same theory.”
• common issues in two actions closely intertwined; third-party defendant not prejudiced
• allowing impleader to promote judicial economy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).