American Fiber & Finishing, Inc. v. Tyco Healthcare Group, LP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Supreme Court’s holding in Freeport-McMoRan was “referring mainly to post-filing transfers of interest—not to all post-filing additions of non-diverse parties”
• \[I]t is firmly settled that challenges to federal subject matter jurisdiction may be raised for the first time on appeal.\
• “In contrast to Freeport-McMoRan, there was no post-filing transfer of interest in the instant case.”
• \Federal courts are expected to monitor their jurisdictional boundaries vigilantly and to guard carefully against expansion . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).