· 3/15/2022
American Federation of Government Employees v. Federal Service Impasses Panel
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Like c. 93A, [c. 272,] §99Q does not involve a tort action, and it is recovery in tort that G.L.c. 231, §85K, caps”
- “The hospital... offers no focused discussion as to why one who commits such a tort [intentional interference with advantageous relationships] would not be thereby shown to have failed to qualify for immunity”
- same for claim under wiretap statute, G. L. c. 272, § 99 Q
- court let stand lower court ruling using improper interference language.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Richard J. Leon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.