American Federation of Government Employees Local 1 v. Stone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that TSA screener’s constitutional claim sounding in equity was not barred by the CSRA and Section 111(d)
• holding CSRA did not preclude judicial review of plaintiffs’ First Amendment constitutional claims for equitable relief when plaintiffs had no remedy under the statute
• holding CSRA did not preclude judicial review of plaintiffs' First Amendment constitutional claims for equitable relief when plaintiffs had no remedy under the statute
• describing Section 111(d) as “a catchall provision giving the TSA Administrator significant discretion over the employment of security screeners”
• noting “the courts’ general reluctance to allow damages as a judicially created remedy for constitutional torts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).