Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that another OPM regulation was inconsistent with DOL’s because it defined a FLSA exemption more broadly
• holding that another OPM regulation was inconsistent with DOL’s because it defined a FLSA exemption more broadly
• holding OPM regulations were inconsistent with DOL’s because they shifted a presumption from the employer to the employee
• “When a RIF occurs, employees are generally laid-off according to their seniority—employees with fewer years of service lose their positions before employees with more years of service.”
• “Although employees who are determined to be executive, administrative, or professional are exempt from overtime, the burden is on the employer to demonstrate the employee is in fact exempt.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).