Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding implied repeal where an appropri- ations act made an “express reference to the earlier statute”
• finding implied repeal where an appropriations act made an “express reference to the earlier statute”
• distinguished from Langston on the basis that the appropriation bill in question there specifically referred to and limited earlier legislation setting salaries
• appropriations limit repealed statute requiring blue-collar government employee to receive more than a 5.5 percent pay raise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).