Skip to main content
· 4/3/1992

American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio, Local 1411, and Helen Owens v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

Citations

  • 960 F.2d 176
  • 295 U.S. App. D.C. 117
  • 139 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2953
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 5721
  • 1992 WL 63524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the distinction between proposed and actual agency action is a distinction without a difference which, if credited for the purposes of applying s 7116(d), \would drain s 7116(d) of much of its utility\
  • finding that although employee’s grievance was barred by section 7116(d), employee could petition General Counsel to reconsider apparently erroneous decision not to prosecute unfair labor practice charge
  • noting that the purpose of section 7116(d) is “to preclude duplicative proceedings by 6 requiring an aggrieved party to make an election of remedies” when “the same facts and the same decision are involved”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buckley, Williams, Ginsburg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.