Skip to main content
· 10/19/1994

American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. Elliot

Citations

  • 523 N.W.2d 100
  • 1994 S.D. LEXIS 167
  • 1994 WL 575678

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[i]f the language of the policy is ambiguous, the policy should be construed liberally in favor of the insured and strictly against the insurer”
  • \Ambiguity in an insurance policy is determined with reference to the policy as a whole and the plain meaning and effect of its words.\
  • availability of additional coverage for business pursuits buttresses finding of no coverage for injuries arising from home day care
  • \ Ambiguity in an insurance policy is determined with reference to the policy as a whole and the plain meaning and effect of its words.\
  • “Ambiguity in an insurance policy is determined with reference to the policy as a whole and the plain meaning and effect of its words.”
  • \Ambiguity in an insurance policy is determined with reference to the policy as a whole and the plain meaning and effect of its words.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, Wuest, Sabers, Henderson, Anderson, Amundson, Konenkamp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.