Skip to main content
· 3/22/1973

American Family Insurance Group v. Ford

Citations

  • 293 N.E.2d 524
  • 155 Ind. App. 573
  • 1973 Ind. App. LEXIS 1258

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that evidence indicating that a letter was not received raises the rebuttable presumption of non-mailing
  • proof of proper mailing of a communication justifies the inference that the mailing was received in due course
  • proof of nonreceipt is evidence that the notice was never mailed which can be overcome by proof of mailing
  • “[R]escission of a contract is an affirmative defense.” (quoting Storer v. Markley, 73 N.E. 1081 (Ind. 1905))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White, Buchanan, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.