Skip to main content
· 2/26/2013

American Electric Power Service Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission

Citations

  • 404 U.S. App. D.C. 105
  • 708 F.3d 183
  • 57 Communications Reg. (P&F) 1006
  • 2013 WL 673501
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 3924

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the Federal Communications Commission reasonably reformulated pole attachment rates that utilities could charge telecommunications carriers in order to achieve equivalency with rate charged to cable television systems
  • The Chevron framework “means (within its domain) that a ‘reasonable agency interpretation prevails.’”
  • The Chevron framework “means (within its domain) that a ‘reasonable agency interpretation prevails.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tatel, Williams, Sentelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.