· 2/26/2013
American Electric Power Service Corp. v. Federal Communications Commission
Citations
- 404 U.S. App. D.C. 105
- 708 F.3d 183
- 57 Communications Reg. (P&F) 1006
- 2013 WL 673501
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 3924
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Federal Communications Commission reasonably reformulated pole attachment rates that utilities could charge telecommunications carriers in order to achieve equivalency with rate charged to cable television systems
- The Chevron framework “means (within its domain) that a ‘reasonable agency interpretation prevails.’”
- The Chevron framework “means (within its domain) that a ‘reasonable agency interpretation prevails.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tatel, Williams, Sentelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.