American Economy Insurance v. DePaul University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to consider third-party complaint where “DePaul was the party that prepared and filed the third-party complaint and used its complaint to seek coverage from American Economy as an additional insured”
• “[W]here an ambiguity exists in the insurance contract, it will be resolved in favor of the insured and against the insurer.” (quotation omitted)
• the court refused to allow a putative additional insured to bolster its claim of coverage by referencing its own third-party complaint
• defining “arising out of” as including “but for” causation
• defining “arising out of’ as including “but for” causation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).