American Eagle Ins. Co. v. United Technologies Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that there was no evidence that the plaintiff had separately bargained for the allegedly defective engine and concluding accordingly that the aircraft hull was not “other property”
• finding, inter alia , no summary judgment evidence before the court indicating plaintiffs bargained separately for the engine
• airplane owner had no tort claim against engine manufacturer for damage to hull of plane after failure of engine caused crash
• airplane owner had no tort claim against engine manufacturer for damage to hull of plane after failure of engine caused crash

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).