American Eagle Ins. Co. v. United Technologies Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that there was no evidence that the plaintiff had separately bargained for the allegedly defective engine and concluding accordingly that the aircraft hull was not “other property”
• finding, inter alia , no summary judgment evidence before the court indicating plaintiffs bargained separately for the engine
• airplane owner had no tort claim against engine manufacturer for damage to hull of plane after failure of engine caused crash
• airplane owner had no tort claim against engine manufacturer for damage to hull of plane after failure of engine caused crash

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Saratoga Fishing Co. v. J. M. Martinac & Co.
  Supreme Court· 1997-06-02· cited 152×
• Trans States Airlines v. Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1997-06-19· cited 76×
• Pugh v. General Terrazzo Supplies, Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2007-07-12· cited 48×
• Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. General Electric Company, Sea-Land Service, Inc. (\Sea-Land\)
  Third Circuit· 1998-01-15· cited 33×
• Lincoln General Insurance v. U.S. Auto Insurance Services, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 2015-05-18· cited 28×
• Alcan Aluminum Corp. v. BASF Corp.
  N.D. Texas· 2001-01-30· cited 22×
• Barzoukas v. FOUNDATION DESIGN, LTD.
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2012-04-11· cited 15×
• Mazurkiewicz v. Clayton Homes, Inc.
  S.D. Texas· 2013-08-02· cited 14×
• Golden Spread Cooperative v. Emerson Process Manag
  Fifth Circuit· 2020-04-08· cited 13×
• McKinney/Pearl Restaurant Partners, L.P. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.
  N.D. Texas· 2017-03-15· cited 11×
• Golden Spread Coop., Inc. v. Emerson Process Mgmt.
  N.D. Texas· 2019-01-31· cited 9×
• Turbomeca, Sa v. French Aircraft Agency
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-26· cited 8×
• Essex Insurance v. Blount, Inc.
  E.D. Texas· 1999-09-08· cited 6×
• Albers v. Deere & Co.
  D. North Dakota· 2008-09-24· cited 6×
• COMPTECH INTERN. v. Milam Commerce Park
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-20· cited 5×
• Marsulex Environmental Technologies v. Selip S.P.A.
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2017-03-27· cited 4×
• Kasprzak v. American General Life & AcciDent Ins. Co.
  E.D. Texas· 1996-01-10· cited 2×
• Gouthro v. General Motors Corp.
  W.D. Oklahoma· 2005-08-08· cited 2×
• Ronald Pugh and Betty Pugh v. General Terrazzo Supplies, Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2007-07-12
• Munters Euroform GmbH v. American National Power, Inc. and Hays Energy Limited Partnership
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2009-12-31

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• Lucas v. Texas Industries, Inc.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1984-07-11· cited 251×
• Cate v. Dover Corp.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1990-06-06· cited 216×
• Mid Continent Aircraft Corp. v. Curry County Spraying Service, Inc.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1978-07-12· cited 149×
• John Stevenson v. Trw Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1993-04-01· cited 131×
• Signal Oil & Gas Co. v. Universal Oil Products
  Texas Supreme Court· 1978-07-12· cited 124×
• Shipco 2295, Inc. v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1987-08-28· cited 68×
• ARKWRIGHT-BOSTON MANUFACTURERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP., Defendant-Appellee
  Fifth Circuit· 1988-05-17· cited 57×
• McAdams v. Capitol Products Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1991-07-17· cited 33×
• Singleton v. LaCoure
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1986-04-17· cited 25×
• Ellmer v. Delaware Mini-Computer Systems, Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1983-12-22· cited 16×
• Allied Finance Co. v. Rodriguez
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1993-12-16· cited 9×
• American Eagle Insurance v. United Technologies Corp.
  Fifth Circuit· 1995-02-24· cited 1×