· 7/11/2006
American Coke & Coal Chemicals Institute v. Environmental Protection Agency
Citations
- 452 F.3d 930
- 371 U.S. App. D.C. 554
- 36 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20137
- 62 ERC (BNA) 1717
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 17245
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that EPA's use of the challenged model was not arbitrary or capricious in part based on EPA's extensive efforts to compare model assumptions against real-world data
- noting that “the purpose of the CWA is to achieve the complete elimination of all discharges of pollutants”
- noting that “the purpose of the CWA is to achieve the complete elimination of all discharges of pollutants”
- excluding from judicial consideration in APA challenge, data not before the agency at the time of the final agency action
- discussing APA notice and comment requirements
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henderson, Rogers, Griffith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.