Skip to main content
· 6/2/2004

American Civil Liberties Union v. Mineta

Citations

  • 319 F. Supp. 2d 69
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9970
  • 2004 WL 1208942

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he connection between the funding restriction and the purpose of the funding does not have to be particularly closely related to withstand a challenge.”
  • “In determining whether to enter a permanent injunction, the Court considers a modified iteration of the factors it utilizes in assessing preliminary injunctions: (l) success on the merits, (2) whether the plaintiffs will suffer irreparable injury absent an injunction, (3
  • “In determining whether to enter a permanent injunction, the Court considers a modified iteration of the factors it utilizes in assessing preliminary injunctions: (1) success on the merits, (2) whether the plaintiffs will suffer irreparable injury absent an injunction, (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paul L. Friedman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.