American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois, Kathryn Giuntoli, and Joan Markley v. City of St. Charles and Fred T.L. Norris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that one plaintiff has standing because “she detours from her accustomed route to avoid the [lighted] cross”
• holding that one plaintiff has standing because “she detours from her accustomed route to avoid the [lighted] cross”
• holding that plaintiffs have standing to assert Establishment Clause violation because, in part, a cross “led [plaintiffs] to alter their behavior”
• holding that plaintiffs’ averment that they altered their normal routes of travel to avoid viewing a lighted cross displayed on public property satisfied Article III standing requirements
• holding that one plaintiff has standing because “she detours from her accustomed route to avoid the [lighted] cross”
• recognizing that “the more sectarian the display, the closer it is to the original targets of the clause, so the more strictly the clause is applied”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).