Skip to main content
· 6/14/2011

AMERICAN BUS ASS'N v. Rogoff

Citations

  • 649 F.3d 734
  • 396 U.S. App. D.C. 353
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 12030
  • 2011 WL 2314995

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that claim that statute “violates equal protection by singling out” certain parties “for special treatment is subject only to rational-basis review”
  • applying rational basis review to a claim that a statute “violates equal protection by singling out [some individuals] for special treatment’
  • “The right ‘extends to [petitioning] all departments of the Government,’ including administrative agencies and courts.” (alteration in original) (quoting Cal. Motor Transp. Co. v. Trucking Unlimited, 404 U.S. 508, 510 (1972))
  • “The right ‘extends to [petitioning] all departments of the Government,’ including administrative agencies and courts.” (alteration in original) (quoting Cal. Motor Transp. Co. v. Trucking Unlimited, 404 U.S. 508, 510 (1972)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garland and Kavanaugh, Circuit Judges, and Williams, Senior Circuit Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.