American Board of Psychiatry & Neurology, Inc. v. Johnson-Powell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant, a physician and psychiatrist who claimed in a resume and in court that she was certified by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, but was not in fact certified, likely infringed plaintiffs registered certification mark
• holding that defendant, a physician and psychiatrist 6 who claimed in a resume and in court that she was certified by the American 7 Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, but was not in fact certified, likely infringed 8 plaintiff’s registered certification mark
• “[A] trademark plaintiff who demonstrates a likelihood of success on the merits creates a presumption of irreparable harm.”
• “on this record, the court could undoubtedly have issued preliminary injunctive relief had it been so inclined”
• “A registered certification mark 10 receives the same protection as a trademark.”
• “AEDPA’s prior approval provision allocates subject-matter jurisdiction to the court of appeals by stripping the district court of jurisdiction over a 10 second or successive habeas petition unless and until the court of appeals has decreed that it may go forward.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).