American Bird Conservancy v. Federal Communications Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ESA’s citizen-suit notice provision did not conflict with Communications Act’s 60-day statute of limitations
• rejecting plaintiffs’ attempt to plead a direct challenge to an order of the FCC as a failure to act claim
• “The proper remedy for an inadequate record . . . is to remand to the agency for further factfinding.”
• “The proper remedy for 19 an inadequate record ... is to remand to the agency for further factfinding.”
• “The proper remedy for 10 an inadequate record ... is to remand to the agency for further factfinding.”
• “American Bird attempts to bypass Congress’ ... system of review ... by characterizing its suit as a challenge to the agency’s compliance with federal environmental laws rather than to the agency’s ultimate order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).