American Bearing Manufacturers Ass'n v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding ITC’s finding that substantially increased imports not likely where “subject foreign producers reportedly operated at high rates of capacity utilization and devoted a significant portion of their exports to markets other than the United States”
• ”[T]he court’s function, is not to reweigh the evidence but rather to ascertain ‘whether there was evidence which could reasonably lead to the [agency]'s conclusion_”'
• “The authority to make a judgment as to the significance of inventory levels or what level of inventories is considered high or low rests with the ITC.”
• “Congress recognized that in determining the significance of the volume, price effect, and impact of imports in the U.S. market, the ITC must evaluate the facts of each particular case, and the industry involved, and make its material injury determination accordingly.”
• affirming ITC’s use of correlation analysis to examine price effects
• “[W]hether to rely primarily on quantity data, value data, or both, to measure the significance of import volume is precisely the type of decision that Congress has entrusted the ITC to make in light of the facts and circumstances of each particular case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).