Skip to main content
· 4/26/2013

American Bank of St. Paul v. TD Bank, N.A.

Citations

  • 713 F.3d 455
  • 91 Fed. R. Serv. 281
  • 2013 WL 1776423
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 8489

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that personal knowledge or perceptions based on experience is a sufficient foundation for opinion testimony of a lay witness
  • finding no error where district court excluded evidence that was irrelevant and would tend to confuse the jury
  • evidentiary rulings are reviewed for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Melloy, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.