Skip to main content
· 8/3/1994

American Automobile Manufacturers Association v. Commissioner, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection

Citations

  • 31 F.3d 18
  • 25 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20080
  • 29 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1186
  • 39 ERC (BNA) 1037
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 19887
  • 1994 WL 393115

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that \[p]revailing parties are normally entitled to costs\ under Rule 39
  • noting that “[p]revailing par- ties are normally entitled to costs” under Rule 39
  • suggesting denying voluntary motion to dismiss if it is based on “unsound argument [of] moot[ness]” (citation omitted)
  • suggesting denying voluntary motion to dismiss if it is based on \unsound argument [of] moot[ness]\ (citation omitted)
  • granting a partial dismissal of some but not all issues on appeal under the federal counterpart to NRAP 42(b)
  • appellant failed to preserve issue for appeal when the argument was first raised in his reply brief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Bownes, Cyr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.