AMERICA II ELECTRONICS INC. v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the movant’s “evidence was sufficient to create a rebuttable presumption of irreparable injury for purposes of obtaining an injunction” under the statute
• recognizing that \a party seeking to enforce a restrictive covenant by injunction need not directly prove that the defendant's specific activities will cause irreparable injury if not enjoined\
• recognizing that “a party seeking to énforcé'a restrictive covenant by injunction'heed not directly prove that the defendant’s specific activities will cause irreparable injury if not enjoined”
• holding that evidence was sufficient to prove a violation of an enforceable restrictive covenant under section 542.335 and, therefore, was sufficient to create a rebuttable presumption of irreparable injury for purposes of obtaining an injunction under section 542.335(j)
• finding that under Section 542.335© of the Florida Statutes, a party seeking enforcement of a restrictive covenant by injunction need not directly prove that defendant’s activities will cause irreparable harm if not enjoined

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).