Skip to main content
· 1/29/1964

Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Rio Oil Co.

Citations

  • 225 F. Supp. 907
  • 1964 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9747

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that mineral lessor was not indispensable party to dispute between mineral lessee and other parties claiming title to the minerals
  • doctrine of laches must be relentlessly enforced in this case because of the fluctuating and speculative character of oil and gas leases — mining and oil properties require extremely prompt action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kerr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.