Skip to main content
· 7/31/1967

Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Bettye M. Marshall

Citations

  • 381 F.2d 661
  • 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5437

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he filing of the declaratory judgment action in the court below was triggered by the letter stating that Amerada would be sued . . . .”
  • “That Amerada’s petition for declaratory judgment apparently was in anticipation of the New York suit is an equitable consideration which the district court was entitled to take into account.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hutcheson, Goldberg, Dyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.