Skip to main content
· 5/17/1999

Amerada Hess Corp. v. Zurich Insurance

Citations

  • 51 F. Supp. 2d 642
  • 41 V.I. 294
  • 1999 WL 391598
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8463

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the policy in dispute in Treister had similar legally obligated to pay' language
  • holding that the pollution exclusion clause barred coverage of a gas leak in a factory and stating, “this may not be a toxic tort the size of Three Mile Island, but neither is it the case that one individual slipped on an open can of Drano”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Finch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.