Amerada Hess Corp. v. Quinn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defining substantiality of noncompliance in terms of its effect or potential effect on the franchisor’s trademark, trade name, image, and good will
• addressing termination of a franchise relationship for failure substantially to perform
• “[P]rotection of the public’s welfare points toward termination of dishonest franchisees.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).