Amer. Pavement Co. v. Wagner
Citations
- 139 Pa. 623
- 21 A. 160
- 1891 Pa. LEXIS 1030
Syllabus
<p>[To be reported.]</p> <p>1. The duties imposed upon the authorities of cities, by § 6, act of May 23, 1874, P. L. 233, providing that all work and materials required by a city shall be done and furnished “under contract, to be given to the lowest responsible bidder,” are not merely ministerial, but are deliberative and discretionary: Commonwealth v. Mitchell, 82 Pa. 343.</p> <p>2. If the officer in whom the function of awarding contracts is lodged, accepts any one of several bids, he is bound by law to give the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, and a court of equity might enjoin the execution of a contract awarded, without sufficient legal cause, to any other bidder, especially if the act was accompanied by evidence of bad faith and unfairness.</p> <p>3. But the officer will not ffender himself individually liable to the lowest bidder by rejecting all bids offered, in the honest and judicious exercise of his discretion, for no one is legally entitled to the contract until it is legally awarded to him, the submission of a bid under the statute being similar, in legal effect, to a bid at an auction sale, where the seller is bound by law to sell to the highest and best bidder.</p> <p>4. At all events, when the director of public works of Philadelphia, in an advertisement inviting proposals, expressly reserved the right to reject any or all bids, he had a right, in the exercise of his judgment and discretion, acting in good faith in the interest of the city, to reject all the bids offered, and advertise for new proposals upon modified specifications.</p> <p>5. And, by so doing and awarding the contract to the lowest responsible bidder under the second set of specifications, the director did not render himself liable for the prospective profits of one who was the lowest bidder under the original specifications, and, insisting on his right to the contract and offering to conform to the new specifications, refrained from bidding the second time.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing the distinction between discretionary and ministerial duties
- discussing the distinction between discretionary and ministerial duties
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Clark, Greek, McCollum, Mitchell, Paxsott, Stebbett, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Weber v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-02-17· cited 77×
- Ammlung v. PlattSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-03-27· cited 74×
- Reese v. DanforthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-10-09· cited 67×
- Conduit & Foundation Corp. v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1979-04-12· cited 52×
- R. S. Noonan, Inc. v. York School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1960-06-30· cited 44×
- Highway Express Lines, Inc. v. WinterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1964-05-11· cited 26×
- Interstate Vitrified Brick & Paving Co. v. Philadelphia, Mack Paving Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1894-10-29· cited 10×
- American Totalisator Co. v. SeligmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-07-01· cited 10×
- Thomas v. OsbornChester County Court of Common Pleas· 1965-12-10· cited 2×
- Township of Lowell v. PattersonMichigan Supreme Court· 1921-06-06· cited 1×
- Maguire v. KirchnerSchuylkill County Court of Common Pleas· 1930-05-19
- A. Salus & Son, Inc. v. KohnPhiladelphia County Municipal Court· 1940-05-03
- Titgen v. SmithPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1949-06-17
- Cantor v. SmallwoodPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1964-12-18
- Cain v. WinterPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1975-04-01
- Sica v. City of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 1982-12-07
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.