Amer Bioscience Inc v. Thompson, Tommy G.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that 3 The plaintiff’s reliance on Horn v. Huddle, Jr., 636 F. Supp. 2d 10 (D.D.C. 2009
• noting that the FDA, “based on its acknowledged lack of expertise and resources, has refused to become involved” in intellectual property disputes
• explaining that the question of whether an agency acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner is a legal one and “[a]bsent very unusual circumstances the district court does not take testimony.”
• describing informal adjudications as agency actions that are neither the product of formal adjudication nor a rule-making
• remanding without vacating when the court is unsure of the grounds the agency asserts to defend its action
• warning against the use of preliminary injunction motions in APA cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).