Amente v. Newman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court may fashion an order that provides discovery of non-party patients by redacting the identifying information
• relying on City of St. Petersburg v. Siebold, 48 So.2d 291, 294 (Fla.1950)
• ordering the discovery of nonparty medical records where identifying information—names and addresses—is removed, but providing for additional procedural safeguards if the trial court is not satisfied that redaction alone is sufficient to protect nonparty privacy
• ordering the discovery of nonparty medical records where identifying information—names and addresses—is removed, but providing for additional procedural safeguards if the trial court is not satisfied that redaction alone is sufficient to protect nonparty privacy
• ordering the discovery of nonparty medical records where identifying information—names and addresses—is removed, but providing for additional procedural safeguards if the trial court is not satisfied that redaction alone is sufficient to protect nonparty privacy
• hearsay information, though inadmissible as evidence in a trial, may constitutionally form basis of an affidavit for a search warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).