Ameneyro v. Hernandez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a fax offering a free Physician's Desk Reference eBook was an unsolicited advertisement under TCPA
• concluding that fax could be an advertisement where it advertised a free e-book and it was “entirely plausible” that the e-book was distributed to “further [Defendant’s own economic interests”
• requiring that fax on its face propose specific commercial transaction “ignores the reality of many modern business models”
• \[W]e hold that the jurisdictional command of the Hobbs Act requires a district court to apply FCC interpretations of the TCPA.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).