Amendment of Rules 4001, 4002, 4004, 4007, 4008, 4012 and 4014 of PA Rules of Judicial Administration

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In certain circumstances, it may constitute an adverse employment action for an employer to make an employee’s EEO-related activity known to others in the workplace.”
• “[E]vidence that an employee was subjected to a double standard on the basis of sex-based stereotypes can supply evidence of pretext.”
• in summary judgment context, dismissing discrimination claim in light of unrebutted, non-discriminatory reason for the employer’s action
• “But, an employer who requires an employee to engage with others in the workplace in a professional manner does not, in doing so, engage in conduct that supports an inference of discrimination.”
• “Isolated, ambiguous remarks are insufficient, by themselves, to prove discriminatory intent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).