Skip to main content
· 5/20/2024

Amen-Bey v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that injuries sustained by indemnitor’s employee while performing contract work on indemnitee’s work site arose out of or “in connection with the execution of the work” despite being caused by indemnitee’s own negligence
  • finding that where a party intends for a contract provision to “shift responsibility,” the provision must “clearly reflect[] such a purpose”
  • finding that where a party intends for a contract provision to “shift responsibility,” the provision must “clearly reflect[] such a purpose”
  • interpreting an agreement that included the clause \shall promptly indemnify and save and hold harmless\
  • words not included in the N.P.P.-Canning contract are italicized; words included only in the N.P.P.-Canning contract are bracketed
  • District of Columbia landowner may not delegate the duty of care related to the performance of inherently dangerous activity on his or her property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Amit P. Mehta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.