Skip to main content
· 7/29/1998

Amcast Industrial Corp. v. Affiliated FM Insurance

Citations

  • 584 N.W.2d 218
  • 221 Wis. 2d 145
  • 1998 Wisc. App. LEXIS 861

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that Edgerton precluded coverage and that fundamental difference between Edgerton and Hills is not based on the ownership of the property in question but rather on whether there is a third-party claim
  • finding that Edgerton precluded coverage and that fundamental difference between Edgerton and Hills is not based on the ownership of the property in question but rather on whether there is a third-party claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Snyder, Nettesheim, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.