Ambrose v. Sheppard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Pjromissory estoppel requires only that the reliance by the injured party be reasonable.” (emphasis and punctuation omitted)
• although plaintiffs’ complaint did not specifically assert a claim for promissory estoppel, they could nevertheless pursue that cause of action where the complaint alleged “facts sufficient to put [the defendant] on notice of such a claim”
• “Questions of reasonable reliance are usually for the jury to resolve.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).