Ambrose v. National Foods Discount

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If a statute uses words or phrases that have already received authoritative construction by a responsible administrative agency, they are to be understood according to that construction.” (citation modified) (quoting A. Scalia & B. Garner, Reading Law 322 (2012)
• “After oral argument, the Supreme Court decided West Virginia v. EPA, 142 S. Ct. 2587, 213 L.Ed.2d 896 (2022). The implication of that decision is that the major questions inquiry appears to be a threshold question to Chevron analysis.”
• “[e]ven if alternative readings are available”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).