Ambrogi v. Gould, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that CERCLA's definition of \removal\ does not encompass medical monitoring
• setting forth elements of prima facia case for recovery of response costs
• expenses incurred for air, water, and soil testing and monitoring can be recoverable only if they were necessary expenses incurred consistent with NCP
• economic losses such as claims of “loss of beneficial use” are not recoverable under CERCLA
• investigative costs are not recoverable where consistency with NCP — a required prerequisite — has not been demonstrated
• \In passing [CERCLA] ... Congress did not intend to make injured parties whole or to create a general vehicle for toxic tort actions.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).