Amber Well Drilling, LLC v. Diegelman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• examining whether certain statements carried “a threat of clear and present danger . . . or whether they [were] of a character which the principles of the First Amendment . . . protect”
• \Freedom of discussion should be given the widest range compatible with the essential requirement of the fair and orderly administration of justice.\
• the Supreme Court has the ultimate authority to determine the meaning and application of the Federal Constitution
• as restated and quoted in Miami Herald v. Tornillo, supra , in Mr. Justice White's concurring opinion
• “Freedom of discussion should be given the widest range compatible with the essential requirement of the fair and orderly administration of justice.”
• “Freedom of discussion should be given the widest range compatible with the essential requirement of the fair and orderly administration of justice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).