Skip to main content
· 12/2/2013

Amazon.Com LLC v. N.Y. State Dep't of Taxation & Fin.

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 682
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3328
  • 571 U.S. 1071
  • 187 L. Ed. 2d 549
  • 2013 WL 4522065
  • 2013 U.S. LEXIS 8717

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The standard for such an injunction [to preserve the status quo pending arbitration] is the same as for preliminary injunctions generally.”
  • “[A]n ‘irreparable harm’ provision in the parties’ agreement, while not controlling, is ‘relevant evidence that can help support a finding of irreparable injury.’” (citations omitted)
  • ‘‘[w]here an arbitration clause is broad . . . arbitrators have the discretion to order remedies they determine appro- priate, so long as they do not exceed the power granted to them by the contract itself’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • four-factor test weighing balance of hardships separately from merits issues
  • affirming grant of preliminary injunction in trademark licensing dispute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.