Amazon, Inc. v. Cannondale Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that order dismissing state-law claims without prejudice when summary judgment is entered on federal claims is a final and appealable order
• noting that the defendant was \sufficiently aggrieved\ because the dismissal without prejudice had given it \only a part of what it sought\
• noting that the defendant was “sufficient ly aggrieved” because the dismissal without prejudice had given it “only a part of what it sought”
• noting that the defendant was “sufficiently aggrieved” because the dismissal without prejudice had given it “only a part of what it sought”
• holding a decision is final when the “plaintiff has been effectively excluded from federal court under the present circumstances” (quotation marks omitted)
• stating that “where [a] dismissal finally disposes of the case so that it is not subject to further proceedings in federal court, the dismissal [without prejudice] is final and appealable”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).