Tenth Circuit· 12/6/2001
Amazon, Inc. v. Cannondale Corp.
Citations
- 273 F.3d 1271
- 61 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1047
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 26118
- 2001 WL 1554060
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ruling that order dismissing state-law claims without prejudice when summary judgment is entered on federal claims is a final and appealable order
- noting that the defendant was \sufficiently aggrieved\ because the dismissal without prejudice had given it \only a part of what it sought\
- noting that the defendant was “sufficient ly aggrieved” because the dismissal without prejudice had given it “only a part of what it sought”
- noting that the defendant was “sufficiently aggrieved” because the dismissal without prejudice had given it “only a part of what it sought”
- holding a decision is final when the “plaintiff has been effectively excluded from federal court under the present circumstances” (quotation marks omitted)
- stating that “where [a] dismissal finally disposes of the case so that it is not subject to further proceedings in federal court, the dismissal [without prejudice] is final and appealable”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Baldock, Van Bebber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States Ex Rel. Conner v. Salina Regional Health Center, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2008-10-02· cited 127×
- Moya v. SchollenbargerTenth Circuit· 2006-09-26· cited 126×
- Mickeviciute v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceTenth Circuit· 2003-04-28· cited 120×
- Briscoe v. FineSixth Circuit· 2006-04-13· cited 111×
- United States v. De VaughnTenth Circuit· 2012-08-31· cited 99×
- Clinton v. Security Benefit LifeTenth Circuit· 2023-03-28· cited 95×
- Gary Kusens, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Pascal Company, Inc., Defendants-Appellees/cross-AppellantsSixth Circuit· 2006-05-09· cited 91×
- Nicodemus v. Union Pacific Corp.Tenth Circuit· 2003-02-13· cited 79×
- Lang v. LangTenth Circuit· 2005-07-08· cited 56×
- Hill Ex Rel. New Mexico Educational Retirement Fund v. Vanderbilt Capital Advisors, LLCTenth Circuit· 2012-12-27· cited 56×
- Sexual Minorities Uganda v. LivelyFirst Circuit· 2018-08-10· cited 47×
- Jackson v. Volvo Trucks North America, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2006-08-24· cited 41×
- Rio Grande Foundation v. Toulouse OliverTenth Circuit· 2023-01-18· cited 32×
- Kerr v. PolisTenth Circuit· 2021-12-13· cited 28×
- Williams v. AkersTenth Circuit· 2016-09-20· cited 25×
- United States v. John F. YeagerSixth Circuit· 2002-09-11· cited 20×
- Miami Tribe of Oklahoma v. United StatesTenth Circuit· 2011-08-30· cited 19×
- In re Natural Gas Royalties Qui Tam LitigationTenth Circuit· 2017-01-04· cited 18×
- Hatten-Gonzales v. HydeTenth Circuit· 2009-08-31· cited 16×
- Tennille v. Western Union (Nelson)Tenth Circuit· 2014-12-22· cited 15×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1971-02-23· cited 14,568×
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-03-24· cited 6,491×
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court· 1941-03-03· cited 3,480×
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1943-06-21· cited 2,418×
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 2,158×
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court· 1990-01-10· cited 2,054×
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 1,115×
- Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. City of ThibodauxSupreme Court· 1959-06-08· cited 647×
- Penteco Corporation Limited Partnership--1985a, an Oklahoma Limited Partnership v. Union Gas System, Inc., a Kansas CorporationTenth Circuit· 1991-04-15· cited 401×
- Citizens Concerned for Separation of Church and State v. The City and County of DenverTenth Circuit· 1980-09-04· cited 288×
- H.B. Hunt and Lola N. Hunt v. Inter-Globe Energy, Inc., John A. Corrente, Forest N. Simon, Third-Party Glenda Perry Simon, Third-PartyThird Circuit· 1985-08-09· cited 159×
- Hyde Park Co. v. Santa Fe City CouncilTenth Circuit· 2000-09-29· cited 133×
- Forney v. ApfelSupreme Court· 1998-06-22· cited 117×
- David C. Disher v. Information Resources, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1989-03-29· cited 87×
- Delores J. Cook v. Rocky Mountain Bank Note Company, a Colorado Corporation, and Romo Corp., a Colorado CorporationTenth Circuit· 1992-09-03· cited 56×
- Michael Korgich v. Regents of the New Mexico School of Mines, a Body CorporateTenth Circuit· 1978-08-18· cited 36×
- Skrzypczak v. KaugerTenth Circuit· 1996-08-12· cited 33×
- Automobile Ins. Co. v. Barnes-Manley Wet Wash Laundry Co.Tenth Circuit· 1948-04-30· cited 23×
- Facteau v. SullivanTenth Circuit· 1988-04-08· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.