Amato v. Western Union International, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a broad interpretation of the transactions prohibited by § 406 bars plaintiffs claim
• employees may be third-party beneficiaries of agreement providing that employee benefits shall not be reduced

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).