Skip to main content
· 9/29/1993

Amato v. Mercury Casualty Co.

Citations

  • 18 Cal. App. 4th 1784
  • 23 Cal. Rptr. 2d 73
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7309
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 12397
  • 1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 975

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he existence of a disputed fact determinative of coverage establishes the duty to defend.”
  • “[T]he existence of a disputed fact determinative of coverage establishes the duty to defend.”
  • “Human nature being what it is, we have no doubt that insureds sometimes lie to their carriers and vice versa. This possibility does not provide sufficient reason to overturn the rule [regarding the duty to defendant when there is a potential for coverage].”
  • noting distinction between the two kinds of cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Woods (a.M.)

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.