Amato v. Intindola

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing cases affirming dismissals for fraud on the court as \examples of knowing deception intended to prevent the defense from discovery essential to defending the claim\
• “The fact that a surveillance tape shows discrepancies usually affects the jury’s view of the case, but in this case it does not merit a dismissal with prejudice to appellant’s case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).